“For many smokers, the emergence of Vape is an exciting opportunity to quit smoking“
“Vape is not a contradiction in helping adults quit smoking and protecting youth. Helping adults quit smoking is a way to protect youth
“Although new evidence emerges endlessly, the core message remains the same: nicotine Vape is not without risks, but its harm is much lower than cigarettes.”
“If you don’t smoke, don’t try Vape. If you smoke, consider using Vape instead”
Recently, the Cochrane Collaboration, an internationally authoritative academic organization for evidence-based medicine, pointed out in its latest research review that 50 professional studies conducted on more than 10,000 adult smokers around the world proved that Vape has Smoking cessation effect, and the effect is better than nicotine replacement therapy and other methods.
The lead author of this review, senior researcher at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, and member of the Corcoran Tobacco Addiction Group, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce and senior researcher at the Nuffield Department of Basic Medical and Health Sciences, Oxford Nicola Lindson published a signed article on The Conversation, pointing out that for many smokers, the emergence of Vape is an exciting opportunity to quit Timesvape smoking. Helping adults to quit smoking and protecting children are not contradictory. Helping adults to quit smoking is a way to protect children.
The following is the full text of the signed article:
The latest review of examples covering 50 studies and more than 12,000 participants has boosted Vape’s confidence. The study believes that compared to traditional nicotine replacement therapies (such as gum or patches) and nicotine-free Vape, nicotine Vape Can help more people quit smoking. And the review did not find any evidence that nicotine Vape has serious harm.
One in two people who smoke regularly will die of smoking-related diseases. Most smokers want to quit smoking, but it is extremely difficult to quit smoking, so a better cessation program is needed.
For many smokers, the emergence of Vape is an exciting opportunity to quit smoking. Vape can imitate certain behavioral, social and pharmacological characteristics of cigarettes, and is a new method of treating addiction. However, despite the growing number of studies supporting Vape’s contribution to smoking cessation, there are still some policymakers who are cautious about Vape.
Although Vape has been widely circulated in some countries, some regional policies still prohibit Vape completely, or nicotine Vape can only be purchased with a prescription. The caution behind these restrictive regulations has nothing to do with whether smokers should switch to Vape.
Although the long-term harm that Vape may bring is still inconclusive, experts generally believe that although it is not completely risk-free, the harm of Vape is far lower than that of cigarettes.
In fact, this caution from supervision is largely related to Vape’s impact on young people. Teens who use Vape are more likely to continue smoking. One voice interpreted as that teenagers who have never smoked will become addicted to nicotine after trying Vape, and then start smoking. In other words, they believe that Vape is the gateway to smoking. Another voice believes that teenagers who try Vape and those who try cigarettes have something in common, that is, curiosity, “Children who like to try will try.” In other words, those teenagers who tried Vape would probably also try cigarettes without Vape. Although research in this area is still in progress, policy debates are mainly divided into two factions: “helping adults quit smoking” and “protecting children.”
Helping adults to quit smoking and protecting children are not contradictory. Children whose parents smoked are about three times more likely to smoke when they grow up than children whose parents do not smoke. As we all know, second-hand smoke can cause many health problems for infants and young children, including sudden infant death syndrome, and Vape smoke is far less harmful to others than cigarettes.
Acknowledging that helping adults quit smoking is also a way to protect children, and if such a consensus can be reached, this debate may be promoted. This requires the formulation of relevant regulations to prevent young people from trying Vape and smoking cigarettes, but also to help adults around them quit smoking. One method that has been tried is to reduce the nicotine content in Vape. But research shows that this may have obs cube unexpected effects-when using Vape with a lower nicotine content, smokers seem to increase their intake to get the desired nicotine level.
Nicotine itself does not cause many smoking-related diseases. In fact, for decades, nicotine replacement therapy has been helping people to quit smoking safely by providing nicotine without other harmful chemicals in cigarettes. Although this therapy is widespread, there is little evidence that non-smokers use it.
Although the discussion of the pros and cons of Adv Vape will become complicated, the regional differences in the use of Vape by teenagers will provide guidance for effective supervision in the future. For example, researchers and decision makers can focus on areas with low teenage Vape usage and compare the regulatory measures in that area with areas with high teenage Vape usage. Ideally, we can learn from the experience and lessons of the method, on the one hand to ensure that those who struggle to quit smoking can get Vape at any time, on the other hand to ensure that Vape is not attractive to non-smokers.
For many years, the tense relationship between “protecting youth” and “helping adult smokers” has hindered the clear transmission of public health information. Although new evidence emerges endlessly, the core message remains the same: nicotine Vape is not without risks, but its harm is much lower than cigarettes. Put it into action: If you don’t smoke, don’t try Vape. If you smoke, consider using Vape instead.